| District | Properties loaded | Code | What says so |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDR-4 the ordinance paragraph quoted here | 165 | Allowed | Subtitle U §801.1(w)(2) An apartment unit that is integrated with and accessory to an artist studio, provided that occupancy of the apartment shall be limited to the artist using the studio portion of the premises and the household of the artist; and (3) A residential dwelling existing on May 12, 1958, provided, any addition to or enlargement of the dwelling shall not result in a lot occupancy of greater than sixty percent (60%); |
| PDR-4/FT the ordinance paragraph quoted here | 33 | Allowed | Subtitle U §801.1(w)(2) An apartment unit that is integrated with and accessory to an artist studio, provided that occupancy of the apartment shall be limited to the artist using the studio portion of the premises and the household of the artist; and (3) A residential dwelling existing on May 12, 1958, provided, any addition to or enlargement of the dwelling shall not result in a lot occupancy of greater than sixty percent (60%); |
Pro and reports for Washington, D.C. are coming soon.
We use this email only to tell you when Washington, D.C. launches. We never share it.
This answer is good through April 3, 2026 — that is the date the ordinance we hold runs to, as published by DC Office of Documents and Administrative Issuances. The District has since adopted something newer that we have not taken in yet, so parts of this may already be out of date.
(none) above means a parcel with no zone code assigned in the District's own data — 5 of them.Owner data from District of Columbia's property ownership records, retrieved September 25, 2026. CC BY 4.0.
Built from scripts/build_reverse_index.py, generated 2026-10-11T20:59:04+00:00.